Creality Ender-3 V3 vs Elegoo Neptune 4

Specifications stated by the manufacturers, with sources. A value is marked as more favourable only when the data are comparable. Specifications with different values: 23 of 31.

Creality Ender-3 V3 detailsElegoo Neptune 4 details

↑ Green: more favorable for the stated criterion. ↓ Amber: less favorable. Indicators compare documented values with matching technology and stated conditions; they do not identify an overall winner. Missing data, equal values and features without a clear advantage stay neutral. Claimed speed and pixel size do not guarantee actual speed or print quality.

Technical specifications comparison
Specification Creality Ender-3 V3Elegoo Neptune 4
Technology FDM FDM
Build area shape Rectangular Rectangular
Build area X

More build space

220 mm ↓ Less favorable 225 mm ↑ More favorable
Build area Y

More build space

220 mm ↓ Less favorable 225 mm ↑ More favorable
Build area Z

More build space

250 mm ↓ Less favorable 265 mm ↑ More favorable
Build volume

More build volume

12.1 L ↓ Less favorable

Calculated from nominal X × Y × Z dimensions.

13.4156 L ↑ More favorable

Calculated from nominal X × Y × Z dimensions.

Installed toolheads / extruders 1 Not documented
Filament diameter 1.75 mm Not documented
Standard nozzle 0.4 mm Not documented
Build plate PEI Not documented
Maximum hotend temperature 300 °C 300 °C
Maximum bed temperature 110 °C 110 °C
Advertised maximum print speed 600 mm/s Not documented
Advertised typical print speed 300 mm/s Not documented
Maximum travel speed Not documented 500 mm/s
Maximum acceleration 20,000 mm/s² 20,000 mm/s²
Minimum layer thickness 0.1 mm Not documented
Maximum layer thickness 0.35 mm Not documented
Automatic leveling Yes Yes
Filament runout sensor Yes Yes
Power loss recovery Yes Yes
Control display diagonal 4.3 in Not documented
Connectivity USB, WLAN, Creality Cloud Not documented
Listed slicers Creality Print, Cura, Simplify3D Not documented
Firmware Not documented Klipper
Manufacturer-listed materials Not documented PLA, TPU, PETG, ABS, ASA, PA
Machine width

Smaller footprint

358 mm ↑ More favorable 475 mm ↓ Less favorable
Machine depth

Smaller footprint

374 mm ↑ More favorable 445 mm ↓ Less favorable
Machine height

Smaller footprint

498 mm ↑ More favorable 515 mm ↓ Less favorable
Net weight

Easier to move

7.83 kg ↑ More favorable 8.3 kg ↓ Less favorable
Rated power 350 W Not documented

Technical sources

Open in the comparison tool to add a third printer