Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus vs Prusa Research Original Prusa XL

Specifications stated by the manufacturers, with sources. A value is marked as more favourable only when the data are comparable. Specifications with different values: 20 of 22.

Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus detailsPrusa Research Original Prusa XL details

↑ Green: more favorable for the stated criterion. ↓ Amber: less favorable. Indicators compare documented values with matching technology and stated conditions; they do not identify an overall winner. Missing data, equal values and features without a clear advantage stay neutral. Claimed speed and pixel size do not guarantee actual speed or print quality.

Technical specifications comparison
Specification Elegoo Neptune 4 PlusPrusa Research Original Prusa XL
Technology FDM FDM
Build area shape Rectangular Rectangular
Build area X

More build space

320 mm ↓ Less favorable 360 mm ↑ More favorable
Build area Y

More build space

320 mm ↓ Less favorable 360 mm ↑ More favorable
Build area Z

More build space

385 mm ↑ More favorable 360 mm ↓ Less favorable
Build volume

More build volume

39.424 L ↓ Less favorable

Calculated from nominal X × Y × Z dimensions.

46.656 L ↑ More favorable

Calculated from nominal X × Y × Z dimensions.

Installed toolheads / extruders Not documented 1
Filament diameter Not documented 1.75 mm
Nozzle material Not documented Brass / Prusa Nozzle
Maximum hotend temperature 300 °C Not documented
Maximum bed temperature 100 °C Not documented
Maximum travel speed 500 mm/s Not documented
Maximum acceleration 12,000 mm/s² Not documented
Automatic leveling Yes Not documented
Filament runout sensor Yes Not documented
Power loss recovery Yes Not documented
Firmware Klipper Not documented
Manufacturer-listed materials PLA, TPU, PETG, ABS, ASA, PA Not documented
Machine width

Smaller footprint

578 mm ↑ More favorable 700 mm ↓ Less favorable
Machine depth

Smaller footprint

533 mm ↑ More favorable 720 mm ↓ Less favorable
Machine height

Smaller footprint

640 mm ↑ More favorable 900 mm ↓ Less favorable
Net weight

Easier to move

14.4 kg ↑ More favorable 27.9 kg ↓ Less favorable

Technical sources

Open in the comparison tool to add a third printer