Creality Ender-3 V3 Plus vs Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus

Specifications stated by the manufacturers, with sources. A value is marked as more favourable only when the data are comparable. Specifications with different values: 23 of 30.

Creality Ender-3 V3 Plus detailsElegoo Neptune 4 Plus details

↑ Green: more favorable for the stated criterion. ↓ Amber: less favorable. Indicators compare documented values with matching technology and stated conditions; they do not identify an overall winner. Missing data, equal values and features without a clear advantage stay neutral. Claimed speed and pixel size do not guarantee actual speed or print quality.

Technical specifications comparison
Specification Creality Ender-3 V3 PlusElegoo Neptune 4 Plus
Technology FDM FDM
Kinematics CoreXZ Not documented
Build area shape Rectangular Rectangular
Build area X

More build space

300 mm ↓ Less favorable 320 mm ↑ More favorable
Build area Y

More build space

300 mm ↓ Less favorable 320 mm ↑ More favorable
Build area Z

More build space

330 mm ↓ Less favorable 385 mm ↑ More favorable
Build volume

More build volume

29.7 L ↓ Less favorable

Calculated from nominal X × Y × Z dimensions.

39.424 L ↑ More favorable

Calculated from nominal X × Y × Z dimensions.

Extruder type Direct drive Not documented
Filament diameter 1.75 mm Not documented
Standard nozzle 0.4 mm Not documented
Nozzle material Hardened steel tip Not documented
Maximum hotend temperature 300 °C 300 °C
Maximum bed temperature 100 °C 100 °C
Advertised maximum print speed 600 mm/s Not documented
Maximum travel speed Not documented 500 mm/s
Maximum acceleration

Higher claimed acceleration

20,000 mm/s² ↑ More favorable 12,000 mm/s² ↓ Less favorable
Minimum layer thickness 0.1 mm Not documented
Maximum layer thickness 0.35 mm Not documented
Automatic leveling Yes Yes
Filament runout sensor Yes Yes
Power loss recovery Yes Yes
Camera Optional Not documented
Listed slicers Creality Print Not documented
Firmware Creality OS / Klipper Klipper
Manufacturer-listed materials Not documented PLA, TPU, PETG, ABS, ASA, PA
Machine width

Smaller footprint

410 mm ↑ More favorable 578 mm ↓ Less favorable
Machine depth

Smaller footprint

445 mm ↑ More favorable 533 mm ↓ Less favorable
Machine height

Smaller footprint

577 mm ↑ More favorable 640 mm ↓ Less favorable
Net weight

Easier to move

11.5 kg ↑ More favorable 14.4 kg ↓ Less favorable
Rated power 350 W Not documented

Technical sources

Open in the comparison tool to add a third printer