Bambu Lab P1S vs Prusa Research CORE One+ Gen2

Specifications stated by the manufacturers, with sources. A value is marked as more favourable only when the data are comparable. Specifications with different values: 24 of 27.

Bambu Lab P1S detailsPrusa Research CORE One+ Gen2 details

↑ Green: more favorable for the stated criterion. ↓ Amber: less favorable. Indicators compare documented values with matching technology and stated conditions; they do not identify an overall winner. Missing data, equal values and features without a clear advantage stay neutral. Claimed speed and pixel size do not guarantee actual speed or print quality.

Technical specifications comparison
Specification Bambu Lab P1SPrusa Research CORE One+ Gen2
Technology FDM FDM
Kinematics CoreXY Not documented
Build area shape Rectangular Rectangular
Build area X

More build space

256 mm ↑ More favorable 250 mm ↓ Less favorable
Build area Y

More build space

256 mm ↑ More favorable 220 mm ↓ Less favorable
Build area Z

More build space

256 mm ↓ Less favorable 270 mm ↑ More favorable
Build volume

More build volume

16.7772 L ↑ More favorable

Calculated from nominal X × Y × Z dimensions.

14.85 L ↓ Less favorable

Calculated from nominal X × Y × Z dimensions.

Enclosed as standard Yes Yes
Extruder type Direct drive Not documented
Filament diameter Not documented 1.75 mm
Standard nozzle 0.4 mm Not documented
Available nozzle diameters 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 mm Not documented
Nozzle material Stainless steel Not documented
Maximum hotend temperature

More temperature headroom

300 °C ↑ More favorable 290 °C ↓ Less favorable
Maximum bed temperature

More temperature headroom

100 °C ↓ Less favorable 120 °C ↑ More favorable
Maximum chamber temperature Not documented 55 °C
Maximum travel speed 500 mm/s Not documented
Maximum acceleration 20,000 mm/s² Not documented
Minimum layer thickness Not documented 0.05 mm
Maximum layer thickness Not documented 0.3 mm
Filament runout sensor Yes Not documented
Camera Built in Not documented
Air filtration Activated carbon Not documented
Machine width

Smaller footprint

389 mm ↑ More favorable 415 mm ↓ Less favorable
Machine depth

Smaller footprint

389 mm ↑ More favorable 444 mm ↓ Less favorable
Machine height

Smaller footprint

458 mm ↑ More favorable 555 mm ↓ Less favorable
Net weight

Easier to move

12.95 kg ↑ More favorable 22.5 kg ↓ Less favorable

Technical sources

Open in the comparison tool to add a third printer